cvs commit: ports/www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu
itetcu at FreeBSD.org
Tue Dec 19 18:24:06 PST 2006
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:55:45 +0300
"Andrew Pantyukhin" <sat at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> On 12/20/06, Alexander Botero-Lowry <alexbl at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > sat 2006-12-19 21:19:05 UTC
> > >
> > > FreeBSD ports repository
> > >
> > > Modified files:
> > > www/eyeos Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> > > Log:
> > > - Update to 0.9.3-5.wink.at.nivit.;)
> > Approved by: nivit ?
> > When committing to another person's port that you're not the
> > maintainer of, you need to put approved by, even if the approval is
> > implicit. That's what (implicit) is for.
> This makes no sense at all. My mission is to confuse
> people, not enlighten them.
[ .. ]
Did nivit approve you commit explicitly ? If yes, an 'Approved by; nivit'
should be in the commit log.
If not, did he gave you a blanket approval to commit to his port ? Then
alexbl is right.
Else you shouldn't have commited.
We just had "commits w/o maintainer approval" discussion on ports@
And, oh, please, let's end this here.
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
BOFH excuse #319:
Your computer hasn't been returning all the bits it gets from the
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20061220/f6c658c7/signature.pgp
More information about the cvs-all