cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install chapter.sgml

Niclas Zeising niclas.zeising at gmail.com
Wed Dec 6 01:15:16 PST 2006


[Send to list as well]

On 12/5/06, Kevin Oberman <oberman at es.net> wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:12:14 +0200
> > From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida at freebsd.org>
> > Sender: owner-cvs-all at freebsd.org
> >
> >
> >

> > On 2006-12-05 13:53, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck at rinet.ru> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Doug Barton wrote:
> > > DB> >   Log:
> > > DB> >   A class C network for 192.168.0.0/24 includes the address
> > > DB> >   range 192.168.0.0-192.168.0.255, not 192.168.0.0-192.168.255.255
> > > DB> >
> > > DB> >   Submitted by:   Tom Van Looy <tom at ctors.net>
> > > DB>
> > > DB> In an ideal world, all references to Class [ABC] networks would
> > > DB> disappear from our docs, and be replaced by their CIDR equivalents.
> > >
> > > There are suprisingly small number of such places.  What do you think about the
> > > patch attached?
> >
> > I'm not sure I like the appearance of "/24" in flowing text, but the
> > patch builds fine.
> >


[snip patch]


> >
> > Is there any way we can rephrase this to avoid having to use /24 in the
> > middle of a sentence.  How do the documentation texts of Cisco and other
> > networking-related companies, which have a lot of texts about CIDR
> > address ranges, deal with this?
>
> CIDR format is specified as address/length, so 128.0.0.0/18 is the only
> sanctioned way to specify this per RFCs. The fact that Cisco routers
> still require the crufty masks and wildcard bits not withstanding.
>
> Juniper routers use only proper CIDR syntax.
>
> FreeBSD will accept either for IPv4 (ifconfig(8)).
>
> In the world of IPv6, only CIDR notation is used, even by Cisco.
>
> We really should only be used CIDR notation unless we are explaining the
> legacy use of masks. Class A/B/C has been obsolete for almost a decade
> and really, really should go away.
>


Maybe we should mention somewhere that the old class A/B/C networks
have been obsoleted by CDIR and not simply remove all references to
it. I also think we should explain a bit about how CDIR works, as
someone suggested. You can also point people to
http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf which
explains a lot about CDIR, subnetting and whatnot.
Just some thoughts.
//Niclas

--


More information about the cvs-all mailing list