cvs commit: www/share/sgml header.ent www/en/layout/css layout.css www/en index.xsl

[Robert Watson]

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Remko Lodder wrote:

>      Well do notice that I am not against the link itself, I am against
>      the way it was being done. doceng@ is not the proper entity for
>      these kind of things, they coordinate the development of documentation
>      and they assign/accept new commitbits. They cannot be seen as the
>      portmgr@ or core@ teams. The proper way is and should be by contacting
>      the webmasters mailinglist on www@ and ask for the change there. This
>      way the webmasters team can either commit it and/or do additional
>      things.
>
>      As the "harm" already had been done, we should not remove the link
>      now (esp. with your reasoning), but I request that this will be
>      done the proper way the next time, and we should (www/doc team) really
>      consider some kind of guideline for new links (To avoid the overload
>      of information we once had with the old site).
>
>      Does that sound reasonable to you Robert?

I think we're in agreement.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge