cvs commit: src/contrib/ipfilter HISTORY Makefile bpf_filter.c ip_fil.c ipf.h ipmon.h ipt.h kmem.h mlfk_rule.c opts.h radix.c radix_ipf.h snoop.h src/contrib/ipfilter/BSD Makefile Makefile.ipsend kupgrade src/contrib/ipfilter/iplang iplang_l.l ...

Alexander Kabaev kabaev at gmail.com
Thu Aug 24 14:16:14 UTC 2006


On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:36:28 +0200
Guido van Rooij <guido at gvr.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 09:20:02AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:37:12 +0000 (UTC)
> > Guido van Rooij <guido at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > guido       2006-08-24 07:37:12 UTC
> > > 
> 
> [..]
> 
> > >   Log:
> > >   MFC: ipfilter 4.1.13
> > 
> > This begs for a question: if ipfilter can not be updated without
> > breaking the tree anymore, does it belong there in the first place?
> 
> We could of course also get rid of the tree ;)
> 
> -Guido
Tree without ipfilter or ipfilter without tree - this is a
technicality.

Seriously though, I wonder how ipfilter is being tested before being
checked in? Past two commits by you suggested that no testing was done
at all. 

-- 
Alexander Kabaev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20060824/bf9c753b/signature.pgp


More information about the cvs-all mailing list