cvs commit: src/sys/conf kern.post.mk
Garance A Drosehn
gad at FreeBSD.org
Tue Sep 13 16:50:24 PDT 2005
At 8:29 AM -0700 9/13/05, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>On Sep 13, 2005, at 5:58 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>AFAIK, we still do not turn softupdates on /, but do on other
>>partitions. With your proposed idea, softupdates should be
>>on on /. How safe is this today?
>I never use separate partitions for /usr and /var on my scratch
>boxes and I always enable SU on /. I can't say I've ever had any
Just as another data point: I do *not* have a separate partition
for /usr and /var (*), so my '/' partitions are similar in size to
the standard setup. On two machines that I can quickly check here,
I have a 300-meg '/' on one, and a 470-meg '/' on the other. My
other systems probably have a smaller root partition, because these
two machines are my two most-recent builds.
I have been running with softupdates enabled on '/' for a long time,
and as far as I know it hasn't caused me any problems since maybe
5.2.1. It did used to cause me occasional problems a few years ago,
but I can't remember any recent problems.
I must admit I'm a little uneasy moving /usr and /var into '/', just
because I'm so used to the way it is. I really *like* having /var as
a separate partition. But hard disks are huge compared to how they
used to be, so I don't mind having a 500-meg '/'. I *do* save the
kernel.debug information in my /boot/kernel's, and my root partition
is still under 50% full.
(* - Except for my PowerPC machine... That machine has everything
in '/' except for one large empty partition on '/usr/obj', and
a memory-disk partition sitting on /tmp_md ).
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at FreeBSD.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA
More information about the cvs-all