cvs commit: ports/print/acroread7 Makefile

[David O'Brien]

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:14:12PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Technically it isn't needed to run brandelf, but to be on the safe side we
> should use it. There are cases where you can shoot into your foot without a
> branded binary. I didn't encountered such an edge case myself, but I
> remember a case where an unbranded binary caused the system to reboot
> (because it triggered the wrong syscall). Feel free to start a discussion
> about the necessarity/deprecation of brandelf on -current if you think
> brandelf is useless.

brandelf is absolutely required if the binary is a static binary.
Because the vendor may change between static and dynamic binary building,
it is a good ideal to always brand Linux binaries.

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)