cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist
flz at FreeBSD.org
Thu Mar 10 11:24:15 PST 2005
Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>>(03.10.2005 @ 1409 PST): Florent Thoumie said, in 1.2K: <<
>>David E. O'Brien wrote:
>>>obrien 2005-03-10 19:05:11 UTC
>>> FreeBSD ports repository
>>> Modified files:
>>> net/rdesktop pkg-plist
>>> Sort the keymaps.
>>> Revision Changes Path
>>> 1.5 +32 -32 ports/net/rdesktop/pkg-plist
>> This is your third commit to get rdesktop updated
>> in two days.
>> There was a PR pending with a patch included. Maintainer
>> has been cc'ed.
>> Please respect ownership when not working on your ports,
>> or at least wait for maintainer timeout before applying
>> your changes.
>>>end of "Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rdesktop pkg-plist" from Florent Thoumie <<
> Sorting the pkg-plist is a trivial change, and was the maintainer's
> responsibility in the first place. Asking for maintainer approval
> for trivial fixes supports a level of bureaucracy that, while nice
> in concept, simple prevents people from applying trivial fixes.
I'm ok, not talking about just sorting the packing list.
> Note that I'm not commenting on David's other commits to rdesktop;
> I haven't looked at them. Note also that I do not know what is in
> the PR. My only argument here is that committers should not feel
> like applying trivial fixes and routine maintenance to the ports
> tree amounts to stepping on someone's toes.
He might be very familiar with this port, I really don't
know, but I've even seen discussions about security updates
where maintainer rejected submitted patches. That's their
The only fact that a PR about rdesktop was in feedback state
should prevent him from just committing an update.
My 2 (new committer's and maintainer's) cents.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20050310/db8eca92/signature.bin
More information about the cvs-all