cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c
scottl at samsco.org
Thu Mar 10 09:46:47 PST 2005
Paul Richards wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:06:16PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
>>Paul Richards <paul at originative.co.uk> writes:
>>>Imagine something like Photoshop being written on the most recent
>>>version of Mac OS X and finding that compatibility only worked
>>>forward. That would mean that most users out there would have to
>>>upgrade their OS in order to use the most recent version of Photoshop!
>>Yes, that is usually how it goes.
> I don't believe it does. Can anyone provide real world examples of
> this happening that we can consider?
You know, I'm completely outraged that I can't use MSWord 2005 on my
Windows 3.1 system! I even installed the win32s library! Don't those
bozos at Microsoft care at all about forwards compatibility?
More information about the cvs-all