cvs commit: ports CHANGES UPDATING ports/Mk bsd.port.mk
ports/accessibility/linux-atk Makefile pkg-plist
ports/archivers/stuffit Makefile ports/astro/linux-setiathome
Makefile ports/audio/baudline Makefile ports/audio/linux-arts ...
David O'Brien
obrien at freebsd.org
Mon Jun 27 17:07:44 GMT 2005
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 05:16:25PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >On Saturday, 18. June 2005 00:59, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >> - Use the correct prefix (X11- instead of LOCAL- or LINUX-) for some
> >>ports. Chase dependencies for this.
> >
> >I know I'm late to the party, but I'm really wondering what that is meant
> >to accomplish.
> >
> >X_PREFIX is *not* the 'correct' prefix for *anything* but the X11
> >distribution - the fact that there's a truckload of other stuff in there
> >is an age-old bug. We *should* be moving stuff *out* of X_PREFIX en masse,
> >but I know how likely that is to happen. We *really should NOT*, however,
> >keep putting *new* stuff in there.
>
> lofi -
>
> You're kindof beating a dead horse here. Many, many people agree with
> you here, and the topic received widespread support when I brought it up
> at the BSCan ports BoF. The issue isn't whether stuff should go into
> LOCALBASE instead of X11BASE, it's how to deploy a mass migration.
Then please update hier(7) - it is quite ambiguous after seeing how
Michael Nottebrock is interrupting it. I am a native English
speaker/writer/reader and I read hier(7) the same as Alexander Leidinger.
--
-- David (obrien at FreeBSD.org)
More information about the cvs-all
mailing list