cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext

[Doug Barton]

Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Monday, 11. April 2005 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
> 
>>Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>
>>>I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional.
>>
>>And I believe emphatically the opposite. And your comment about the
>>procmail filter is totally unsuitable for those who pay for their bandwidth
>>by the byte. The more burdens you add to ports maintainers the fewer of
>>them we will be able to attract.
> 
> 
> Note that the automatic mails people are discussing here would be sent to the 
> *committer*, not the maintainer - and as a ports-committer, you pretty much 
> have opted in to receive (and read, too!) all sorts of mails regarding your 
> work when you accepted the commit bit. It's a punishment after all.

Thank you for clarifying this. You've now given me yet another reason to not 
ever pick up and commit a PR for a new port.

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection