What we keep under /etc
matusita at jp.FreeBSD.org
Sat Oct 9 11:47:02 PDT 2004
Please consider what FreeBSD users think, not us -- they usually
change /etc files directly (not using CVS or revision control system,
nor making a diff against the original), updating the world from a new
source code _not_ so many times, read written documentation (not
Makefile nor code itself), ... IMHO for those users, updating /etc
files without any warnings could lead a panic, so we must avoid it as
For my understandings, that's why mergemaster(8) (or "check and help
updating /etc files" tool) is there. If mergemaster(8) behaves badly,
we can fix it -- not changing what "make installworld" does.
eivind> I think this is a good solution because this is not a merging
eivind> problem, it is a mergemaster problem.
> Since mergemaster(8) is considered as a mandatory tool for admin (I
> hope nobody objects),
eivind> I object.
Ouch:) Yes I know that some users doesn't update /etc if installworld
as you mentioned. However, according to src/UPDATING, mergemaster(8)
is listed in source-code upgrade procedure -- and many users knows
what mergemaster(8) is. Many guys mentioned to use mergemaster(8) on
current@/stable@ list. No matter what you dislike or not, it seems
that it's mandatory one....
eivind> The majority do (in order of frequence, high to low) manual
eivind> updates or don't update /etc unless they have to or use
eivind> etcmerge or write their own scripts.
you also think that it would be better updating /etc files by some
other tools (well, I'll try using etcmerge later, thank you), not by
"make installworld", right?
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
More information about the cvs-all