cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mntopts.h mount.8 mount.c
andrea+freebsd_cvs_all at webcom.it
Tue Nov 30 09:51:28 PST 2004
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 05:19:12PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > > >>Is it useful for the nodev option to cause a hard failure here? Note, I'm
> > > >>not arguing against either change, just pointing out a side effect.
> > > >
> > > > There's no longer a "nodev" option, please ask Poul-Henning for details. ;)
> > >
> > > Yes, I understand the mechanics, I'm just curious if you think that this
> > > should result in a fatal error. It sounds like you think that the answer
> > > to that is yes, which if that is the correct answer I'm fine with that.
> > I think a reasonable alternative would be for use of the nodev option to
> > silently no-op in all cases but (perhaps) devfs, since the behavior
> > described for nodev is in fact now simply the way the system behaves.
> > Maybe the middle ground is to print a warning?
> If it's intended behaviour then it's probably ok as is for -HEAD.
... although a HEADSUP would be nice...
Still, it was my impression that phk@ was trying to do what Robert
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day;
teach him to use the Net and he won't bother you for weeks.
More information about the cvs-all