cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c
wb at freebie.xs4all.nl
Wed Nov 3 14:02:40 PST 2004
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 02:47:33PM -0700, Scott Long wrote..
> David O'Brien wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:29:38PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>On Friday 29 October 2004 07:48 pm, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >>>I made 3-4 requestss, each one had an ACK that said, "sorry, right
> >>>on it!"
> >>>It's just not acceptable.
> >>Are you volunteering to be an re@ secretary ala wilko@?
> >Why does every group now need a secretary? Maybe we just need more
> >members on RE@ that are very active.
> With all due respect, I'd like the members of the release engineering
> team to decide what is best for them, and have less armchair
> quarterbacking of what others think we need.
I would just like to say this: don't overengineer what aint broken. Sjeez..
it is hardly a Supreme Court worthy case that re@ forgot to update some
stupid web page is it?
Wouldn't a normal, if need be public, reply to the automated reminder
email have been sufficient to get that fixed?
Wilko Bulte wilko at FreeBSD.org
More information about the cvs-all