cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/d

[Nate Lawson]

On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20040316.224458.21308983.non at ever.sanda.gr.jp>
>             non at ever.sanda.gr.jp writes:
> : From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan at jp.FreeBSD.org>
> : Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:14:53 +0900 (JST)
> : > In article <200403150741.38591.peter at wemm.org>
> : > Peter Wemm <peter at wemm.org> writes:
> : > > I don't really care where they go, as long as it isn't in the MD include
> : > > areas (they are not MD!), and not in sys/.  My favorites right now are
> : > > dev/pc98/* or compat/pc98/*.  I would also like sys/device_port.h to
> : > > move there too since it is used by the same group of ct/ncv/nsp/stg
> : > > drivers.
> : >
> : > I repeat that they have NO relations with pc98.  So, the above
> : > proposals are not acceptable.
> :
> : I agree with nyan-san. They are not specific to pc98 not for
> : compatibility. I think they should be in sys/ or dev/dev/* or
> : somewhere MI and not in compat/* .
>
> dev/pc98 isn't right.  I have pcmcia cards that are supported by the
> ncv, nsp and stg drivers running on an i386 box.  dev/sys is fine by
> me too if you are looking for a name.

Blech, did you see the suggestion for /src/sys/dev/ic/ ?

-Nate