cvs commit: ports/emulators/rtc Makefileports/emulators/rtc/files
DougB at FreeBSD.org
Wed Mar 10 14:05:30 PST 2004
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > *Actually* make rtc work on post-502104 -CURRENT.
> > Is a PORTREVISION bump needed?
> > Kris
> It couldn't hurt, thanks for the reminder.
I know I harp on this a lot, but I'm curious about this one. Why is a
portrevision bump useful here? I see two possibilities:
1. A user has a working version of the port.
2. A user did not have a working version of the port, therefore it
In the first case the bump is harmful, since it causes the user to
upgrade something for no benefit. In the second case, the bump is
Is there a part of this picture that I'm not seeing?
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the cvs-all