cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4

[Roman Kurakin]

non at ever.sanda.gr.jp wrote:

>From: Roman Kurakin <rik at cronyx.ru>
>Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300
>  
>
>>Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but
>>it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis
>>
>>1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation.
>>So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users.
>>    
>>
>
>Currently, no. Pages in man4.i386 are also installed for i386/pc98.
>  
>
>>2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added
>>we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would
>>be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users.
>>    
>>
>
>Well, I have had ct.4 for several months. I was suggested not to
>commit ct.4 into man4.i386 but to create man4.pc98 and add into it by 
>Warner-san. 
>
>Probably we can create man4.pc98, then copy and modify Makefile so
>that we don't have to put copys into man4.pc98 (I am not sure here),
>and change src/share/man/man4/Makefile, 
>
>--- /usr/src/share/man/man4/Makefile    Wed Jul 16 09:03:29 2003
>+++ Makefile    Thu Mar  4 10:58:07 2004
>@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@
> MLINKS+=xl.4 if_xl.4
> 
> # XXX NOT IMPORTED:    man4.hp300 man4.sparc man4.tahoe man4.vax
>-.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE_ARCH})
>-SUBDIR=        man4.${MACHINE_ARCH}
>+.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE})
>+SUBDIR=        man4.${MACHINE}
> .endif
> 
> .include <bsd.prog.mk>
>  
>
>Or maybe,
>man4/man4.i386		common
>man4/man4.i386/i386	specific to i386
>man4/man4.i386/pc98	specific to pc98
>  
>
This is better, cause I if get right, we could have MACHINE_ARCH=i386 
and MACHINE
other thane i386 or pc98.

Roman

>// Noriaki Mitsunaga 
>
>
>  
>