cvs commit: ports/devel/boost Makefile
kris at obsecurity.org
Mon Feb 16 22:42:00 PST 2004
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 01:28:29AM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote:
> > > Maybe BROKEN would be more suitable, unless the incorrect threading causes
> > > a security problem?
> > No, but it causes runtime problems for people who link against it with
> > the default threads library, so BROKEN is inappropriate.
> Marking it BROKEN would prevent users from installing it at all, unless
> they edit out the BROKEN line--or is there something I'm missing?
BROKEN packages are still built on bento (to test that assertion), so
users could pkg_add boost and end up with dual-linked binaries.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20040216/b0d8f69b/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the cvs-all