cvs commit: ports/net/centericq Makefile
clsung at tw.freebsd.org
Sun Aug 22 08:56:25 PDT 2004
I just began to ask someone to test that patch
(Felipe Gustavo de Almeida <galmeida at a0z.org> give me). :)
In fact, I didn't feel bad about this, but maybe some policies
should described in committer's guide. The guide is my current
Anyway, thanks to unbreak this port. I should prepare a 5.*
machine in future.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 11:14:00AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Vanilla I. Shu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:56:50PM +0000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> >>sobomax 2004-08-20 19:56:50 UTC
> >> FreeBSD ports repository
> >> Modified files:
> >> net/centericq Makefile
> >> Added files:
> >> net/centericq/files extra-patch-gcc34
> >> Log:
> >> Unbreak with gcc 3.4.
> >> Obtained from: Gentoo
> >> Based on: http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/net-im/centericq/files/centericq-4.9.12-gcc3.4.patch
> > I know you unbreak this ports,
> > but how about give a chance to our new committer(clsung)?
> > and respect other committer?
> Well, considering the following factors:
> a) in no case this patch can make situation worser than it is already;
> b) port have been broken for the quite some time now, and the problem
> was already reported on mailing lists several times, so that maintainer
> certainly had his chance to act;
> c) I've sent patch to the author of the software, so that hopefully he
> will integrate it into the next official release.
> I decided that contacting maintainer doesn't worth it, I apologise if it
> caused any bad feelings to clsung. In general I think that there are
> cases (like this for example) when contacting maintainer is not quite
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20040822/6e9e7e2d/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-all