cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h
extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c
pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h
main.c perform.c ...
ceri at submonkey.net
Wed Aug 11 11:23:33 PDT 2004
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Ceri Davies wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> >>eik 2004-08-11 16:16:24 UTC
> >> - replace the perl version of pkg_version(1) by its C equivalent,
> >> which means that `pkg_version -c' does no longer work
> >I don't think that this should have gone into RELENG_4, in this case.
> Maybe. I don't know whether I should have asked re@ first, the MFC was
> announced in the commit log and `pkg_version -c' is stupid anyway, so I
> doubt anyone uses it. When you insist I can provide a shell script
> providing the same functionality or add it to the C version.
I agree that it's stupid; I'm just not sure that removing an option is a
good thing at this stage in RELENG_4's life.
> The problem with the package tools is that they are strongly tied with
> the ports tree, which is the same on -CURRENT and -STABLE, and the new
> features are really worth the MFC. And the C version is much faster than
> the perl one.
> Anyway, how do you think we should proceed from here?
I'd imagine it's a call for re@ - personally I have no attachment to
`pkg_version -c', but wanted to note that this is possibly a bad thing.
It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/attachments/20040811/c4c77a28/attachment.bin
More information about the cvs-all