cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.sboot0_512.s boot0sio.s

[Julian Elischer]

errr..

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
> > In message <20040427.131322.102770380.imp at bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
> > 
> > >Shouldn't this be boot0_512.S since it is pre-processed?
> 
> It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks.
                                                          ^ generic

obviously there were bootblocks befoe that.. I ported teh MACH
bootblocks and one of the things I had to do was to
fiddle with filenames from .s to .S and change the comments to suit.

Gosh that was a long time ago...


> The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C
> preprocessor.
> (or did I get this the other way around :-)
> 
> > 
> > If we have such a convention: yes.  I wasn't aware of it.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> > phk at FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> > FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
> > 
> 
>