SVN for ports

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2012-Jul-16 11:36:27 +1000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen at missouri.edu> wrote:
>1.  Does anyone anticipate wanting a ctm-svn-ports, or will ctm-ports be 
>enough?

Speaking for myself, no but you might want to see how popular ctm-svn
is - I'm not sure if any "official" SVN mirrors exist so CTM may make
a useful tool for replicating the SVN repos (though it's not really
publicised).

>2.  At some point, I would like to stop creating deltas for ctm-cvs. 
>These deltas take a long time (an hour or two) for my computer to 
>create.  (It takes about a minute to create ctm-svn deltas.)  Will this 
>upset people?

It won't upset me.  I suggest you monitor the mailing list and FTP
downloads (talk to the various mirror admins) and see how popular
they still are.

The only reason I can see for sticking with CVS would be disk space.
The SVN repository is about 4x the size of the CVS repository.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users/attachments/20120717/5d2ec603/attachment.pgp