ruby version going backwards...?

[Chuck Swiger]

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 02:12:57PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
>>Did PORTEPOCH get removed?
> 
> No, as you can see there was no PORTEPOCH that was removed :)
> 
> The ruby upgrade was reverted, but this has just caused further
> problems :/

You're right: v1.89 has PORTEPOCH set, v1.88 does not.

v1.88 should have had PORTEPOCH set so that ruby-1.8.3,1 > ruby-1.8.2_5,1, or 
was the point to roll back to 1.8.2 by setting PORTEPOCH?

-- 
-Chuck

% head -15 /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile
# New ports collection makefile for:    ruby18
# Date created:         6 May 2001
# Whom:                 Akinori MUSHA aka knu <knu at idaemons.org>
#
# $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile,v 1.89 2005/11/14 09:46:15 sem Exp $
#

PORTNAME=       ruby
PORTVERSION=    ${RUBY_PORTVERSION}
PORTREVISION=   5
PORTEPOCH=      1
CATEGORIES=     lang ruby ipv6
MASTER_SITES=           ${MASTER_SITE_RUBY}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=     ${MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR_RUBY}
DISTFILES=              ${RUBY_DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}

% head -15 /usr/ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile
# New ports collection makefile for:    ruby18
# Date created:         6 May 2001
# Whom:                 Akinori MUSHA aka knu <knu at idaemons.org>
#
# $FreeBSD: ports/lang/ruby18/Makefile,v 1.88 2005/11/09 08:54:12 sem Exp $
#

PORTNAME=       ruby
PORTVERSION=    ${RUBY_PORTVERSION}
CATEGORIES=     lang ruby ipv6
MASTER_SITES=           ${MASTER_SITE_RUBY}
MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR=     ${MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR_RUBY}
DISTNAME=               ${RUBY_DISTNAME}
DIST_SUBDIR=    ruby