OCE and GPT. No Dice!
Lister
lister at kawashti.org
Mon Apr 26 13:58:23 UTC 2010
$ dumpfs /dev/da0p2
magic 19540119 (UFS2) time Sun Apr 25 20:40:18 2010
superblock location 65536 id [ 4bd08383 b5a1e1a4 ]
ncg 205 size 50384895 blocks 50359677
bsize 65536 shift 16 mask 0xffff0000
fsize 65536 shift 16 mask 0xffff0000
frag 1 shift 0 fsbtodb 7
minfree 8% optim time symlinklen 120
maxbsize 65536 maxbpg 8192 maxcontig 2 contigsumsize 2
nbfree 49949427 ndir 5 nifree 6350052 nffree 0
bpg 245897 fpg 245897 ipg 30976 unrefs 0
nindir 8192 inopb 256 maxfilesize 36033195603132415
sbsize 8192 cgsize 65536 csaddr 125 cssize 65536
sblkno 2 cblkno 3 iblkno 4 dblkno 125
cgrotor 57 fmod 0 ronly 0 clean 1
avgfpdir 64 avgfilesize 16384
flags soft-updates
fsmnt /SH/huge
volname swuid 0
I'd also like to suggest growfs be in a bug state for the same reason as dumpfs. It reports its error in blocks while it takes input in sectors.
-----
Hatem Kawashti
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andriy Gapon" <avg at icyb.net.ua>
To: "Lister" <lister at kawashti.org>
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 15:50
Subject: !Probable-UBE! Re: OCE and GPT. No Dice!
> on 26/04/2010 16:34 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 26/04/2010 16:31 Lister said the following:
>>> I didn't think 50384895 was in blocks because growfs itself takes -s
>>> <sectors> for input and it's man page has nothing about errors in
>>> blocks, or at all!
>>> Again, according to dumpfs manpage, and I quote "If -m is specified, a
>>> newfs(8) command is printed that can be used to generate a new file
>>> system with equivalent settings." newfs takes -s <sectors> not blocks.
>>> Given that, dumpfs has a bug, at least with -m option.
>>
>> Yep, I agree, it's a mess.
>
> In fact, it's quite strange.
> Can you provide output of dumpfs without -m option, only the header (before first
> blank line)?
>
>
> --
> Andriy Gapon
More information about the freebsd-geom
mailing list