freebsd-current Digest, Vol 429, Issue 8
Radio młodych bandytów
radiomlodychbandytow at o2.pl
Fri Jan 6 18:09:28 UTC 2012
On 2012-01-05 21:03, kabaev at gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
> <matthew at phoronix.com> wrote:
>
>> > Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking
>> > on [1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the
>> > developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor
>> > scores on be 'it should be tuned, is configured for a diffe The
>> > response from us to this comes in two forms.&nb 1) If it is the
>> > wrong workload for the platform, do a public pos explaining and
>> > analysing the results. Highlighting the rationale fo r the
>> > concious reduction in performance (ie: journaling filesystems with
>> > ba filesystem integrity 2) If tuning can have a material impact
>> > on the results, post a t uning guide with step by step and
>> > rationale. Ie: educate the communit Michael and I have had many
>> > discussions with vendors an on this. In almost all cases, the
>> > vendor has either cha default configuration or accepted the results
>> > as valid. As guide, Micha comparison. To dat offer. In part,
>> > thi public, but that is more of a result of a one sided d party
>> > external to a particular community (with a healthy tou
>> > journalisticly pumped compare& contrast). For the FreeBSD
>> > community, who else outside of the FreeBSD community actually runs
>> > public c Matthew
> Not really related to the discussion on hand, but the above about the
> most unreadable email I am yet to read on the public mailing list.
Yeah, I actually ignored it because of poor readability.
--
Twoje radio
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list