rewinding a disk drive takes too long
Garance A Drosihn
drosih at rpi.edu
Sun Jan 18 18:49:01 PST 2004
At 11:13 PM +0100 1/17/04, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>In message <E1Ahyej-0000OI-5l at psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
> >
>>btw, what i forgot to say was
>> o source system is current as of yesterday
>> o dest system is stable as of today
> > o until the last upgrade to the stable dest, dump would
> > never complete! it always got to the same point, 86%,
> > and then hung
>
>This is actually a pretty normal thing, dump is not very good at
>predicting the size of a dump if the filesystem is live (and I
>belive in a few other circumstances as well)
>
>Largest number I've seen recently was -250% :-)
Why would dump have trouble predicting the size of a "L"
filesystem? If "L" is specified (and it apparently was in
this example), then wouldn't dump be working off of a static
snapshot of the filesystem?
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih at rpi.edu
More information about the freebsd-current
mailing list